World Cup wrap-upThe tournament is finally over, and despite the awkward TV times, I managed to catch most of the games live. My overall impression is that the game has taken a major egalitarian turn; so many countries stepped up and proved that they could play with the big boys. However, traditional team stereotypes also proved accurate, as if to show that the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Hats off to Japan and South Korea for being great hosts; they (especially S. Korea) proved the naysayers wrong with the quality of the venues, the hospitality (by all accounts), and most remarkably, the mettle of their teams. I particularly enjoyed watching Japan and was bummed they couldn't get beyond the Round of 16, as their ferocious quickness was a marvel to behold. And South Korea looked very strong, powerful, and relentless. The two Asian qualifiers (China and Saudi Arabia) showed they were nowhere near the level of play of the co-hosts and made quick, lopsided exits. The Korean team thrilled its fans but sadly never got off the peninsula (an appearance in the final in Japan would have been great ironic drama).
The biggest disappointments I think were the African teams. I was appalled that Cameroon could lose to Germany even when up one and then two men, and Nigeria showed its youth and inexperience. Tunisia and South Africa were not expected to impress, and they didn't. Senegal ended up the surprise, upending France in the very first game and moving on to become the only African team to advance. Methinks that maybe the African athleticism has been overstated a bit, but nevertheless there is tons of talent there for the picking if only the continent had the money to develop some decent leagues.
The CONCACAF teams were steady, with Mexico and USA each advancing to the Second Round and Costa Rica being sent home by Turkey and Brazil. Costa Rica just peaked too early, while Mexico dominated their group unexpectedly--most expected the Italians to cakewalk. The USA plainly did not deserve to advance after its showing against Poland and every American involved with US soccer should be kissing Korea's collective ass for that bit of luck. Of course, Portugal stunk and didn't deserve to go either, so perhaps the US deserved to advance by default. All this is not to say that we didn't have a great team--we did, and they proved it against Mexico and Germany--it's just that the way we advanced was sickening. And Mexico.... All I can say is, I root for Mexico most of the time, but I also despise them. I've played soccer against Mexicans, and it seems to be in their mentality that it is okay to play cheap, to commit dirty fouls, and to act. I have no respect for that and until the Mexicans can start playing like gentlemen, I hope they keep getting one-upped by us norteamericano bullies.
The South American teams were all over the map. Paraguay showed flashes of brilliance but in general suffered a lack of talent. Ecuador also was not impressive. Uruguay proved it had the skills to advance, if not the luck, while Argentina succumbed to the hype. Frankly, I've never been impressed by them, and they don't seem to do nearly as well when they can't get away with using their hands. The England-Argentina match was supposed to be a blockbuster, but Argentina was shut down nonchalantly. Sweden just plain embarrassed them. Brazil, however, was Brazil. One might say that the demise of Brazilian soccer has been proven to be greatly exaggerated. They won every game, and while they can be faulted for a bit of luck in the first Turkey game, they proved the second time around that they really were the better team. The flair was there, and so was the defense and goalkeeping, surprisingly. My one complaint is that some of the Brazilian players can act with the best of them, especially Rivaldo and Ronaldo. In general, they act like a bunch of wussies out there and seem afraid to play physical soccer. But there is no denying the immense talent on that squad, as seems to be the case year in and year out. The country is just a superstar soccer stud factory, and they deserved the championship.
And then there are the European teams. Of course, no team from Europe has ever won a World Cup outside of Europe, and that held true again, so maybe predictions of a French dynasty were a bit premature. As a matter of fact, I was shocked not that France got bounced early, but that they couldn't even score a goal. Undoubtedly the injuries to their midfield were consequential, but how do you have the leading scorers from the Italian and English premier leagues (Trezeguet and Henry) and fail to score a goal? Unbelievable.
Oh, and let's not forget the whining Italians. Hey, pardon my French, but fuck the Italians. They are snobs in their country, and they're whiners in soccer, too. They play ugly soccer, are content to score a goal and play lock-down defense (even when they don't have the talent to truly do so), and think everything should go their way by divine right. Of course officials screwed up and called back a couple goals; no doubt Italy was robbed there. But they blew other chances, so I don't want to hear any of it, and that threat by the Italian club owner to dump the Korean player who scored against them was plain petty.
Portugal was arguably the most overrated squad out there. Luis Figo is good but he looked tired and exhausted from his club schedule, and the Portuguese defense was laughable. Not only that, but they were just plain stupid to get two red cards against South Korea. Their Iberian neighbors Spain lived up to their disappointing reputation and proved they can whine almost as well as the Italians.
I can't say much about Slovenia, Croatia, Russia, and Poland. The Slavs were collectively very disappointing, and the Russian rioters in Moscow didn't warm my perception of them either.
On the other hand, I love Ireland, and their fans are the greatest. Ireland plays with so much heart, and at the end of the day--win or lose--their fans salute them proudly. Roy Keane was not missed.
The Scandinavian teams proved the shockers of the tournament, with Denmark and Sweden each winning their group. Denmark in particular looked daunting after their dismantling of France, but England humbled them. Meanwhile the Swedes looked downright dangerous on the attack, with their feet and their heads. Sweden-Senegal was a match you hate to see because someone has to go home the loser, and unfortunately for Sweden, Senegal was able to get the Golden Goal.
England was, well, England. Hot and cold, brilliant and embarrassing, unstoppable and flimsy....If you look up "inconsistent" in the dictionary, you'll find a photo of the English team right there. They looked magnificent against Denmark, stodgy against Nigeria and Argentina, but clumsy against Sweden (a match they should have won), and intimidated by Brazil. In fact, England apparently never came out of the locker room at halftime of the Brazil game, and they weren't particularly impressive in the first half either. I love England, but rooting for them is as bad as rooting for USC football--they always disappoint in the end and their glory years were about thirty years ago.
Belgium, how did they get in? Talk about boring soccer. Germany was supposed to be boring and weak, but they looked sharp. I was very impressed, and no doubt Oliver Kahn had a great deal to do with their run. Sure he had trouble handling a rocket shot from Rivaldo, but then who wouldn't, especially in the rain? They were downright scary in the air, and their defense looked impenetrable at times. I retain my biggest compliment for their ball handling skills and passing precision, however--stuff that I wouldn't expect from Germany.
And then there was my favorite team of the tournament: Turkey. From their opening game against Brazil, I was impressed; they didn't back down, they fought hard, and they had some major skills at every position on the field. I applaud their third place finish, although I would've liked to have seen them upset Brazil for payback's sake. A Turkey-Germany final would've been great, too--I could just have imagined the riots that might have broken out in Germany had the Turks won that one. Incidentally, I was in Turkey when Fehnerbace (sp.) won the Turkish soccer league title over Galatasaray (at least I think I remember that correctly) in May, 2001. I just love that country, for many reasons. I expect Sas, Ilhan, Umit Davala (ugh--what a terrible mohawk) and the goalie to be hot commodities this year as the various European powerhouse clubs make efforts to strengthen their squads.
Speaking of hot commodities, I think American players and Senegalese players also can count on some fat paychecks coming; there will be a lot of competition for their services. It's too bad MLS doesn't have the financial wherewithal to hold onto its biggest stars and lure others from overseas.
The final was good, and Brazil deserved to win. There were some exciting almost-goals, and Ronaldo's pair were splendid finishes. Ronaldo's haircut was ridiculous, but I understood the message behind it; the statement was that Brazil needed to push their players forward and attack to win, and they did. I already can't wait for qualifying to begin for the 2006 tournament!